Re: ALTER EXTENSION ... UPGRADE; - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dimitri Fontaine
Subject Re: ALTER EXTENSION ... UPGRADE;
Date
Msg-id m2sjy4xea8.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ALTER EXTENSION ... UPGRADE;  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: ALTER EXTENSION ... UPGRADE;  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

I've been reading through the entire thread and it seems like this is
the best mail to choose to answer.

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> Maybe I misread David's meaning, but I thought he was saying that
> there's no value in inventing all those control file entries in the
> first place.  Just hard-wire in ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE the convention
> that the name of an upgrade script to upgrade from prior version VVV is
> EXTNAME-upgrade.VVV.sql (or any variant spelling of that you care for).

Yeah that works, as soon as VVV is the version we upgrade from.

That said, we need to find a way to lighten the process for extensions
where it's easy to have a single script to support upgrade from more
than once past release.

What about having the following keys supported in the control file:
 upgrade_<version> = 'script.version.sql' upgrade_all = 'script.sql'

Where the version here is the version you're upgrading *from* (to is
known and static when you distribute the files after all), and where
upgrade_all is applied last no matter what got applied before.

Also, do we want a subdirectory per extension to host all those files?

Regards,
-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: unlogged tables
Next
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: unlogged tables