Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dimitri Fontaine
Subject Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
Date
Msg-id m2sjmfu7te.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> I'm in favor of making that distinction.  I would still have pgsql_fdw,
> file_fdw, etc, be packaged more-or-less the same way and still use the
> CREATE EXTENTION framework, of course.

We called that idea “core extension” at the latest hackers meeting, and
Greg Smith had a patch with a first selections of extensions to package
this way.

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Florian Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: Hot Backup with rsync fails at pg_clog if under load
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor