Re: Application name patch - v2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dimitri Fontaine
Subject Re: Application name patch - v2
Date
Msg-id m2r5sxpzzt.fsf@hi-media.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Application name patch - v2  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> 2009/10/20 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
>> "psql" or "java".  The cases that are actually useful are the ones where
>> the application sets it.  I don't think we should have a default at all
>> --- you don't set it, you don't get a name.
>
> For psql, yes.

What about having psql -f foo.sql using 'psql: foo.sql' or sth as the
default value?
--
dim


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Privileges and inheritance
Next
From: Chris Price
Date:
Subject: Using pgcrypt to meet PCI compliance?