Re: A different approach to extension NO USER DATA feature - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dimitri Fontaine
Subject Re: A different approach to extension NO USER DATA feature
Date
Msg-id m2r5bjzudv.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A different approach to extension NO USER DATA feature  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: A different approach to extension NO USER DATA feature  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> one I'd been thinking about a bit was OIDs of modules this one depends
> on.  The current design doesn't cope very well with modules that depend
> on other ones.

Or even at all.  I guess here "modules" is referring to shared object
libraries, right?  Or are you already thinking about extension that
depend on other extensions, like earthdistance depends on cube?

Regards,
-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Where the Quals are actually 'List'ed
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Sync Rep for 2011CF1