Re: PL/java? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Gunnar Rønning
Subject Re: PL/java?
Date
Msg-id m2ofovgqz0.fsf@smaug.polygnosis.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PL/java?  ("Alex Knight" <knight@phunc.com>)
List pgsql-general
* "Alex Knight" <knight@phunc.com> wrote:
|
| Even when compiled into bytecode, Java is much slower than C/C++ when

Well, compiling into bytecode is what you always do on the Java platform.
There are some native compilers as well for the Java _language_,
but these do not produce faster code than what you get with the best
of breed just in time compilers.


| bechmarked... However, Java does what I need it to. But just to clarify,
| the "myth" continues on about "slowness."

Feel free to live in the dark.

Why do you think IBM jumped on the Java wagon ? Because they needed
some cute applets on their desktops ?

http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/iseries/news/05jun2000.htm


--
Gunnar Rønning - gunnar@polygnosis.com
Senior Consultant, Polygnosis AS, http://www.polygnosis.com/

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Gunnar Rønning
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/java?
Next
From: Gunnar Rønning
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/java?