Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> I'm not real sure what this'd buy us that wouldn't be done as well or
> better by creating a view on the remote side. (IOW, there's nothing
> that says that the remote object backing a foreign table can't be a
> view.)
Agreed, for those remote sides that know what a view is.
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
