Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> I'm not sure if anybody is particularly against the initial contents
> looking like that. The big problem, which both you and Dimitri are
> conveniently ignoring, is that if people are allowed to hand-edit
> the file they are going to introduce comments that no mechanical
> parser will do a nice job of preserving.
IMO the only reason why my proposal is sound is that is address the
point. Consider:
cat postgresql.conf.d/work_mem
16MB
This database needs at least such a value.
Note it's overridden in some ROLEs setup.
With such a format (name is filename, value is first line content's,
rest is comments), it's easy to preserve comments and have them machine
editable. What do I miss?
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
