Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> However, it's not quite that simple. "just adding a fork()" doesn't
> work on all our platforms, and you need to deal with feedback and such
> between them as well.
I'd think client-side, we have an existing implementation with the
parallel pg_restore option. Don't know (yet) how easy it is to reuse
that code…
> Oh, and this might be the use-case for integrating the streaming log
> code as well :-) But if we plan to do that, perhaps we should pick a
> different name for the binary? Or maybe just share code with another
> one later..
You're talking about the pg_streamrecv binary? Then yes, my idea about
it is that it should become the default archive client we ship with
PostgreSQL. And grow into offering a way to be the default restore
command too. I'd see the current way that the standby can switch
between restoring from archive and from a live stream as a first step
into that direction.
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
