Re: PL/java? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Gunnar Rønning
Subject Re: PL/java?
Date
Msg-id m2g0a1zu4v.fsf@smaug.polygnosis.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PL/java?  (merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz))
Responses Re: PL/java?
List pgsql-general
* merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) wrote:
|
| If you'd just stop saying things that can't be backed up, I wouldn't
| have to keep responding.

;-)

| Where is your proof that mod_perl is "slower than most any j2ee
| application"?

I don't like to generalize either. I've been on two projects where we
have replaced Perl applications with Java applications. The first one
was a content management system and the second was an online dating
application(like match.com).

In both cases we ended up with Java applications that performed
better than the Perl applications.

The reasons ?

- Maybe it was because our Java developers were
  better than our Perl developers.

- Maybe we had learned something the second time implementing the
  application. Better architecture, system design, etc.

- Maybe Java was better suited for the actual applications.

In the end there is however no proof to claim that Java applications
are faster than mod_perl applications.

But having Java in the PgSQL backend would be nice for some, regardless
of how well Java compares to Perl.

--
Gunnar Rønning - gunnar@polygnosis.com
Senior Consultant, Polygnosis AS, http://www.polygnosis.com/

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Norbert Zoltan Toth"
Date:
Subject: Re: Index usage question
Next
From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz)
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/java?