Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I wasn't really proposing to get rid of it, but I do wonder if there
> are some configuration parameters we could add somewhere that would
> make common cases easier without making really complex things
> impossible.
I think the solution to that problem is to provide a default archive
command that just does the very simple thing, namely moving the WAL file
to some place given as parameter. Some “local” mount point.
>> Now, providing a more useful sample script is certainly reasonable.
Allow me to insist here, I don't think a sample is what we need to be
providing our users. I think they deserve a default production grade
implementation of a very simple archive command.
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
