Re: Backup docs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dimitri Fontaine
Subject Re: Backup docs
Date
Msg-id m2fw9vgrpq.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Backup docs  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: Backup docs
List pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> This is copied from the old documentation. It used to say "It is not
> necessary to be concerned about the amount of time elapsed between
> pg_start_backup and the start of the actual backup, nor between the
> end of the backup and pg_stop_backup".
>
> And the whole idea was to simplify the text at the beginning ;)

Oh I see, not your patch to fix then. I just quick read the diff, as you
can see.

> This is copied exactly from what it is today. I'm sure it can be
> approved, but it's not the goal of this patch. Let's not let
> perfection get in the way of improvement...

Same.

> It does, it's under "standalone hot backups". The second to last part
> of the patch.

Perfect then.

Sorry for the noise, regards,
-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Pg default's verbosity?
Next
From: "ktm@rice.edu"
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq compression