Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> I think it may be time to bite the bullet and change that (including
>> breaking dumpSequence() into two separate functions). I'm a little bit
>> worried about the compatibility implications of back-patching such a
>> change, though. Is it likely that anybody out there is depending on the
>> fact that, eg, pg_dump --section=pre-data currently includes SEQUENCE SET
>> items? Personally I think it's more likely that that'd be seen as a
>> bug, but ...
FWIW, +1
> Specifically, I'm thinking this, which looks rather bulky but most of
> the diff is from reindenting the guts of dumpSequence().
I see that you commited that patch, thanks a lot Tom!
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
