Re: Triggers with DO functionality - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dimitri Fontaine
Subject Re: Triggers with DO functionality
Date
Msg-id m2d39di0os.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Triggers with DO functionality  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Triggers with DO functionality  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> Has anybody stopped to look at the SQL standard for this?  In-line
> trigger definitions are actually what they intend, IIRC.

In which language?  Do we need to include PL/PSM to be compliant, and
use that by default?  In that case we might want to force people to
spell out LANGUAGE plpgsql when we don't provide for PSM yet, so that we
avoid some backwards compatibility problems down the road.

Regards,
-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Triggers with DO functionality
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Triggers with DO functionality