Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dimitri Fontaine
Subject Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling
Date
Msg-id m2bp2eh60s.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> I don't really think that's a behavior we want to encourage.  ISTM the
> cases that are going to be trouble are paths you failed to think about,
> and therefore what you want to do is look over the whole output set to
> see if there are any surprising paths...

Mmm, yes.  Ok.

-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage
Next
From: Kohei Kaigai
Date:
Subject: Re: sepgsql contrib module