Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> However, the only way I can see to fix this "automatically" is to have
>> the makefiles propagate PG_VERSION_NUM (or one of the other values set
>> by configure) into generated control files.
>
> Ah, somewhat like what I was asked to remove from the patch, right?
I've been pointed off-list that this message ain't conveying the meaning
I'm attaching it, sorry about that. What I mean is that should we change
our opinion again the code to do that has already been written.
Allow me to insist on "we": it's not like I feel forced into changing
the design again and again, I realise I'm acting eagerly upon group
decision making steps before to ensure it's the final step. Well, we all
have been reading over-stressed exchanges on this list before, right? :)
Will now step back on the topic, or try to...
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
