Re: SET variable - Permission issues - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dimitri Fontaine
Subject Re: SET variable - Permission issues
Date
Msg-id m24nzfp9y9.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SET variable - Permission issues  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes:
> Well, we've identified a few people who like the idea, but I'm not
> sure we have the degree of consensus we normally look for before
> putting something on the TODO list.  After the discussion on this
> thread, are there still any *objections* to allowing bounds or
> subsets to be SUSET to limit GUC values more strictly than the
> limits hard-coded in C?

No objection here, I like this whole idea.  Adding the information
visible at the right places is a fun project in itself, too :)

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Florian Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: Index only scan paving the way for "auto" clustered tables?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Dumping roles improvements?