Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> One of the biggest current complaints about recovery.conf from
>> Debian/Ubuntu users is the fact that it lives in $PGDATA. Won't we just
>> get the same thing here?
I don't think so, see below.
> I don't think that's the same case, but ... why exactly don't they like
> recovery.conf, and can you show that the location of the file has
> anything to do with the underlying complaint? Personally I bet it's
> more about the confusion between configuration and triggering functions.
> Until we can get those things separated, using recovery.conf to argue
> about file locations will result in nothing but confusion and bad
> design.
I think it's all about having a user-edited configuration file somewhere
else than /etc, and that keeping the triggering functions separated from
the setup itself would be a good thing to have.
I bet that if some facts and links are necessary they will appear soon,
now is not a right time for me to be searching for those facts…
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
