Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> It would be useful (this would allow per-standby buffer tables, for that
> matter), but it would also be tremendously difficult. Seems worthy of a
> TODO, though.
Don't we have anything covering xid-less tables in the TODO already? The
read-only tables "compressions" of removing large part of headers seems
to come up often enough…
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
