Re: Can PyGreSQL be updated? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
Subject Re: Can PyGreSQL be updated?
Date
Msg-id m14NRIt-000AYEC@druid.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Can PyGreSQL be updated?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thus spake Bruce Momjian
> It is 3.1 already.  The problem is that Announce says 3.1, while the
> README says 2.5.  I am CC'ing the author to update it.
> 
> > I got a bug report on the PyGreSQL version included with PostgreSQL 7.0.3:
> > 
> > "version 3.1 pygresql is available and there's also a 3.2 beta. the
> > packaged version is 2.4."
> > 
> > The version in 7.1beta3 is only 2.5.

Yes, I noticed that just after I released it.  The current beta says
3.2 already so that I won't forget this time.

-- 
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@{druid|vex}.net>   |  Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/                |  and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)   |  what's for dinner.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: m w
Date:
Subject: Subject: like vs '='
Next
From: Alfred Perlstein
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: 1024 limits??