Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL History(Parody) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL History(Parody)
Date
Msg-id m10qc1w-0003kGC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to PostgreSQL History(Parody)  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL History(Parody)  (Dmitry Samersoff <dms@wplus.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
:-)

> <center>
> <h1>
> The History of PostgreSQL</h1></center>
>
> <center>
> <h2>
> Part II(Parody)</h2></center>
> After PostgreSQL 6.5, we decided to change some things.  First, we
> cut out the beta testing period.  We decided to make every prime-numbered
> release a stable release.  This worked fine for a while, but as the
> version numbers got larger, the number of prime numbers became rare. 
> We put out more unstable releases to reach the prime stable release version
> numbers.  We removed the regression tests.  (Saved disk space). 
> The documentation was too hard to maintain, so we removed that too. 

    Also,  as  Stonebreaker  once said, productional rule systems
    are conceptually simple. After  changing  our  concepts  some
    more it was so easy that really a first time BASIC programmer
    could have done it all (we simply simplyfied your concept  by
    removing productional rules at all - no concept no problems).


Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#========================================= wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vadim Mikheev
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6
Next
From: Vadim Mikheev
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6