Re: [HACKERS] What about LIMIT in SELECT ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Subject Re: [HACKERS] What about LIMIT in SELECT ?
Date
Msg-id m0zVfKV-000EBPC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] What about LIMIT in SELECT ?  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] What about LIMIT in SELECT ?  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: [HACKERS] What about LIMIT in SELECT ?  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
>
> I agree.  Another good thing is that the LIMIT thing will not require a
> dump/reload, so it is a good candidate for a minor release.

    That's wrong, sorry.

    The  limit  thing as I implemented it adds 2 new variables to
    the Query structure. Rewrite rules are stored  as  querytrees
    and in the existing pg_rewrite entries that would be missing.


Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#======================================== jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] using indexes
Next
From: Paul Friberg CEO - ISTI
Date:
Subject: PostgreSQL COPY command