Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres - Y2K Compliant....Yes or No - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Postgres - Y2K Compliant....Yes or No
Date
Msg-id m0zVR3K-0000emC@druid.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Postgres - Y2K Compliant....Yes or No  ("Chris Williams" <chris_d_williams@itd.sterling.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Postgres - Y2K Compliant....Yes or No  (Tom <tom@sdf.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Thus spake Chris Williams
> I have seen other postings about Y2K compliance of postgres but no answers.  Can anyone tell me how
> compliant Postgres is?

darcy=> select 'NOW'::timestamp;
?column?              
----------------------
1998-10-19 17:45:27-04
(1 row)

Now 2038 compliance is another matter.  :-)

P.S.  I'm sure we'll have 8 byte times by then.

-- 
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@{druid|vex}.net>   |  Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/                |  and a sheep voting on
+1 416 424 2871     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)   |  what's for dinner.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: inet/cidr/bind
Next
From: darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: inet/cidr/bind