Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v6.4 BETA2... - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v6.4 BETA2...
Date
Msg-id m0zTljI-0000emC@druid.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to PostgreSQL v6.4 BETA2...  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v6.4 BETA2...  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v6.4 BETA2...  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thus spake Marc G. Fournier
> With this BETA, the source code is frozen...there is *absolutely* no
> changes to be made except that which is required to fix a bug that
> pertains to the building and/or running on a particular platform, or to
> fix a crucial bug.

What about the inet stuff.  I'm just waiting for Paul's inet_cidr*
functions to test and submit the final stuff.  As it stand it will
crash the backend if you use it.  I guess that makes it a bug fix,
right?

I'll submit the builtins.h changes in the meantime.  Perhaps I can
cobble up my own version of the inet_cidr* functions at least to
be able to test my functions.

--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@{druid|vex}.net>   |  Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/                |  and a sheep voting on
+1 416 424 2871     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)   |  what's for dinner.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Date:
Subject: Re: order by and index path
Next
From: jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] What about LIMIT in SELECT ?