Re: Buffer locking is special (hints, checksums, AIO writes) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Buffer locking is special (hints, checksums, AIO writes)
Date
Msg-id kjdgvws34gpnz4y6xu5aaeul5mspgy3ahvyiw4lndb3ecsacdb@b2ccyowotpqh
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Buffer locking is special (hints, checksums, AIO writes)  (Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Buffer locking is special (hints, checksums, AIO writes)
Re: Buffer locking is special (hints, checksums, AIO writes)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2026-01-09 13:08:43 +0500, Kirill Reshke wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jan 2026 at 05:29, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> >
> > I think 0001, 0002, 0003 can be committed. 0004, 0005 are new and probably
> 
> 0001 LGTM.
> 
> I also did look at 0002, looks sane.

Thanks for looking!

I've pushed 0001/0002 now.  I fixed a typo or two since the last published
version.

I'm doing another pass through 0003 and will push that if I don't find
anything significant.

Also working on doing comment polishing of the later patches, found a few
things, but not quite enough to be worth reposting yet.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Álvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH} Move instrumentation structs
Next
From: Artem Gavrilov
Date:
Subject: Re: Timeline switching with partial WAL records can break replica recovery