If it's "not production," (and I understand all the nuances of "sort of production") why not just 9.3 both of them and use built-in replication? What are you trying to accomplish that you feel Slony will do better?
-------- Original message --------
From: wambacher
Date:06/04/2014 3:24 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: [ADMIN] which slony to start?
Hi
i'm plannig to use Slony to do some replication between 2 Ubuntu-Systems
running postgresql 9.1 and 9.3.
reading this page http://slony.info/ i'm a little bit confused which
slony-version would be the best to start with.
2.2.2 , 2.1.4 or 2.0.8?
It's a production system but not for commercial (critical) use. Just an
OpenStreetmap database of ~600GB
regards
walter
--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/which-slony-to-start-tp5806072.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - admin mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
