Re: Consistency of distributed transactions - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Pete Chown
Subject Re: Consistency of distributed transactions
Date
Msg-id is5an8$188$1@dough.gmane.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Consistency of distributed transactions  (Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>)
List pgsql-general
Craig Ringer wrote:

> Distributed transactions will give you atomicity if done right - with
> two-phase commit (2PC) - but AFAIK will *NOT* give you consistency
> across the databases in question.

That's useful to know -- thanks.  At least now I know my idea won't
work, so I can forget about it and try to think of something else. :-)

Pete

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Aleksey Chirkin
Date:
Subject: Returning from insert on view
Next
From: Michal Politowski
Date:
Subject: Mixed up protocol packets in server response?