Hi,
On 2026-06-15 16:20:02 -0700, Jacob Champion wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2026 at 2:54 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > I did try creating an archive of an install, but that ends up with a good bit
> > of additional complexity, because the installations aren't relocatable (there
> > are header paths that are patched during install, apparently). And where the
> > install should be depends on the runner type, larger runners don't have D:,
> > but slower runners require using D:. I think Bilal hacked further on my
> > experiments around this, but I don't quite know where that stands. It's
> > certainly not a trivial change.
>
> Huh. (How does the current robocopy relocation work, then?)
It works because the pre-existing installation is left in-place, so the few
includes reaching the "wrong" directory are harmless.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
