Re: pg_migrator - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: pg_migrator
Date
Msg-id i2j603c8f071004261855o351595c6xf3e457dabe5dcd57@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_migrator  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>> > There was talk of including pg_migrator in Postgres 9.0 in /contrib. ?Do
>> > we still want to do that?
>>
>> I think you articulated some pretty good reasons previously for
>> keeping it separate and, at any rate, I'm not eager to do it at the
>> 11th hour without due consideration and adequate engineering time.  So
>> I vote for holding off for this release and possibly revisiting at
>> some point down the road.
>
> You might also remember I was outvoted.  It will not be hard to put it
> in /contrib as that is already a valid build option for pg_migrator.

[shrug...]

If that's the consensus I'll go along with it, but I'm not excited
about adding more things to our to-do list at this point, even
apparently simple ones.

...Robert


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_migrator
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_migrator