On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 3:29 AM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 2:56 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Robert Treat
>> <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>>> Personally I think the top teams thing has caused more trouble/confusion than
>>> any benefit it has produced, and at this point I think it could be dumped, and
>>> with that our top 20 would become much more reasonable looking. imho.
>>
>> That'd be fine with me, too, as would any of the other suggestions so
>> far offered.
>
> I disagree - I like the teams feature.
I like it, too. Just, I don't like the fact that the team member
names are displayed so much less prominently than the non-team-member
names. It doesn't seem particularly fair, but it also doesn't make
much sense - the top poster (Bruce) isn't visible when you load the
page, unless you scroll.
> How about just listing top posters and top teams separately, and not
> including the people under each team. Maybe something like
This solution, like all of the other solutions so far offered, would
be fine with me.
> My only concern with that is that the poster names could become quite long.
Yeah. Magnus' prototype doesn't look too bad, though. I liked
parentheses around the number of posts better than a dash before it,
but with parentheses around the team name, there's not much choice but
to do something different for the post count. And from an information
point of view I think it's definitely a big improvement.
...Robert
