Re: Implement waiting for wal lsn replay: reloaded - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Implement waiting for wal lsn replay: reloaded
Date
Msg-id fu7fhl3jo3lwufvznmmdmoy3nc6ydijisutt34747b2ora2qvl@mi3hpzofw46h
Whole thread
In response to Re: Implement waiting for wal lsn replay: reloaded  (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Implement waiting for wal lsn replay: reloaded
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2026-04-07 16:46:29 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2026, 16:18 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > On 2026-04-07 21:05:40 +0800, Xuneng Zhou wrote:
> > > I’ve posted two patches. The first fixes the duplication issue
> > > reported by Andres and is fairly straightforward. The second turned
> > > out to be more complex than expected, and I’m still working through
> > > possible solutions. Feedback or alternative approaches would be very
> > > helpful.
> > > I also spent some time drafting a patch to address the memory ordering
> > > issue and will post it later.
> >
> > I propose quickly applying a minimal patch like the attached, to get the
> > test
> > performance back to normal.
> >
> > Will do so unless somebody protests within in one CI cycle and one coffee.
> >
> 
> I would be able to review them only after several hours. But +1 for
> applying now to get rid of buildfarm slowdown.

Done.

Just to be clear, I didn't apply Xuneng's patches, just the minimal fix for
the slowdown.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Matheus Alcantara"
Date:
Subject: Re: Asynchronous MergeAppend
Next
From: Ashutosh Sharma
Date:
Subject: Re: synchronized_standby_slots behavior inconsistent with quorum-based synchronous replication