Hi,
On 2025-03-06 17:42:30 -0800, Jeff Davis wrote:
> At minimum, we would need to at least add the option "--with-
> statistics", because right now the only way to explicitly request stats
> is to say "--statistics-only".
+1, this has been annoying me while testing.
I did get confused for a while because I used --statistics, as the opposite of
--no-statistics, while going back and forth between the two. Kinda appears to
work, but actually means --statistics-only, something rather different...
> To generalize this concept: for each of {schema, data, stats} users
> might want "yes", "no", or "only".
> If we use this options scheme, it would be easy to change the default
> for stats independently of the other options, if necessary, without
> surprising consequences.
>
> Patch attached. This patch does NOT change the default; stats are still
> opt-out. But it makes it easier for users to start specifying what they
> want or not explicitly, or to rely on the defaults if they prefer.
>
> Note that the patch would mean we go from 2 options in v17:
> --{schema|data}-only
>
> to 9 options in v18:
> --{with|no}-{schema|data|stats} and
> --{schema|data|stats}-only
Could we, instead of having --with-$foo, just use --$foo?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
