Re: time taking deletion on large tables - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: time taking deletion on large tables
Date
Msg-id ff79272c-eaf0-23dc-ae35-086995bc56a0@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: time taking deletion on large tables  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-performance
On 12/3/20 11:16 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> writes:
>> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 08:43:57PM +0530, Ravikumar Reddy wrote:
>>> When I try to do a delete like this:  it hangs for an entire day, so I
>>> need to kill it with pg_terminate_backend(pid).
>>>
>>> DELETE FROM feed_posts
>>> WHERE feed_definition_id = 'bf33573d-936e-4e55-8607-72b685d2cbae'
>>> AND created_at > '2020-05-11 00:00:00'
>>> AND created_at < '2020-05-12 00:00:00';
> 90% of the "delete takes forever" complaints that we hear trace down to
> having a foreign key reference to the deletion-target table that's not
> backed by an index on the referencing column.  Then you end up getting
> a seqscan on the referencing table to look for rows referencing a
> row-to-be-deleted.  And then another one for the next row.  Etc.
>
> You could try "explain analyze" on a query deleting just a single
> one of these rows and see if an RI enforcement trigger is what's
> eating the time.
>
>             



Yeah. IIRC some other RDBMS systems actually create such an index if it
doesn't already exist. Maybe we should have a warning when setting up an
FK constraint if the referencing fields aren't usefully indexed.


cheers


andrew



--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: time taking deletion on large tables
Next
From: Nagaraj Raj
Date:
Subject: Temporarily disable not null constraints