On 6/15/21 1:52 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
>> On 2021-Jun-15, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I think this ought to be reverted and reviewed more carefully.
>> It seems to me that removing the cast-to-range[] is a sufficient fix,
>> and that we can do with only the unnest part for pg14; the casts can be
>> added in 15 (if at all). That would mean reverting only half the patch.
> Might be a reasonable solution. But right now I'm annoyed that the
> buildfarm is broken, and I'm also convinced that this didn't get
> adequate testing. I think "revert and reconsider" is the way
> forward for today.
>
>
(RMT hat on) That would be my inclination at this stage. The commit
message states that it's trivial, but it seems not to be, and I suspect
it should not have been done at this stage of the development cycle.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
