[GENERAL] Final pg_dumpall should happen in Single-User-Mode - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Thomas Güttler
Subject [GENERAL] Final pg_dumpall should happen in Single-User-Mode
Date
Msg-id fed030c4-2181-bff2-8fa3-95e1c11e476f@thomas-guettler.de
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [GENERAL] Final pg_dumpall should happen in Single-User-Mode  (Thomas Güttler <guettliml@thomas-guettler.de>)
List pgsql-general
I did a stupid mistake. I run the final pg_dumpall without switching to single-user-mode first.

With "final" I mean that the dump should be transferred to a different machine. After the dump
the old machine was shut down forever.

My mistake was that I stopped the services, but one process was still alive and this process
inserted to the database after pg_dumpall has started.

I guess I am not the first one who did this stupid mistake.

What do you think? Wouldn't it be polite to add a note about this topic to the docs?

Here are the docs for pg_dumpall: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/app-pg-dumpall.html

How could the wording look like? I am not a native speaker ....

Or do you have a better/different idea?

Regards,  Thomas Güttler


-- 
Thomas Guettler http://www.thomas-guettler.de/
I am looking for feedback: https://github.com/guettli/programming-guidelines


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] BDR, limit number of groups in a cluster
Next
From: rob stone
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_ident mapping Kerberos Usernames