On 07.10.23 03:18, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-10-04 at 13:16 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> At minimum I think we need to have some internal functions to check
>>> for
>>> unassigned code points. That belongs in core, because we generate
>>> the
>>> unicode tables from a specific version.
>> That's a good idea.
> Patch attached.
Can you restate what this is supposed to be for? This thread appears to
have morphed from "let's normalize everything" to "let's check for
unassigned code points", but I'm not sure what we are aiming for now.
