Re: [HACKERS] PL_stashcache, or, what's our minimum Perl version? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PL_stashcache, or, what's our minimum Perl version?
Date
Msg-id fd90cca4-db1c-b760-dd17-eafa304020d6@2ndQuadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] PL_stashcache, or, what's our minimum Perl version?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] PL_stashcache, or, what's our minimum Perl version?
List pgsql-hackers

On 07/27/2017 11:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> I kinda suspect we're not actively testing non-MULTIPLICITY builds
> either.  The 5.8.7 test I just ran was with a non-MULTIPLICITY build,
> so the case doesn't seem actively broken, but I doubt there is any
> buildfarm coverage.  I wonder if it'd be worth getting the buildfarm
> to log the output of "perl -V" so we could get a clearer picture
> of what's being tested.
>
It's quite possible, but in general it will need a new buildfarm client release. If you choose a few possibly critical
animalswe can ask the owners to apply a fairly simple patch.
 

cheers

andrew



-- 
Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Update comments in nodeModifyTable.c
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: LP_DEAD hinting and not holding on to a buffer pin on leaf page(Was: [HACKERS] [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench)