Re: BUG #19548: Missing dependency between a graph edge and the related PK - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: BUG #19548: Missing dependency between a graph edge and the related PK
Date
Msg-id fd4b8e54-f19f-4e4b-ba0c-0108ab7bc871@eisentraut.org
Whole thread
In response to Re: BUG #19548: Missing dependency between a graph edge and the related PK  (Ayoub Kazar <kazarayoub2004@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
On 16.07.26 14:13, Ayoub Kazar wrote:
> I checked with Oracle as well to see the behavior and i can confirm its 
> the same (its a standard thing, see below).
> 
> The KEY, either explicit or implicit through the PK is used just at 
> graph definition time: the catalog just keeps the column numbers in the 
> relative graph element table (in your case, the family table). There's 
> no dependency kept.

Correct.  The current behavior is intentional.




pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: PG Bug reporting form
Date:
Subject: BUG #19557: Parallel leader stuckat ParallelFinish leaked InterruptHoldoffCount
Next
From: Paul Kim
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #19523: psql tab-completion shadows pg_db_role_setting