Re: Error: "could not fork new process for connection: Cannot allocate memory" - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Laurenz Albe
Subject Re: Error: "could not fork new process for connection: Cannot allocate memory"
Date
Msg-id fce391ac5b00b86921e680ebd37eaa802e51dd39.camel@cybertec.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Error: "could not fork new process for connection: Cannot allocate memory"  (frank picabia <fpicabia@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Error: "could not fork new process for connection: Cannot allocate memory"  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Error: "could not fork new process for connection: Cannot allocate memory"  (frank picabia <fpicabia@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-admin
On Mon, 2020-12-21 at 09:17 -0400, frank picabia wrote:
> This error occurred a couple of days ago and it is unlikely to repeat as
> it was a series of exams being done in moodle with over 500 students.
> However I'd like to tune Postgres to see if it can be prevented.
> 
> First of all, we did not run out of memory within the OS.  This system is monitored by cacti and
> Real Used memory never exceeded 30 GB on a server having 64 GB ram plus some swap.
> 
> I can also see in the messages log, the Linux kernel OOM killer was never triggered.
> 
> The postgres user running the DB has no ulimits on memory which might apply.
> 
> Here is the entry in the Postgres log:
> 
> <2020-12-19 13:19:29 GMT>LOG: could not fork new process for connection: Cannot allocate memory
> TopMemoryContext: 136704 total in 13 blocks; 6688 free (4 chunks); 130016 used
> smgr relation table: 24576 total in 2 blocks; 13904 free (4 chunks); 10672 used
> TopTransactionContext: 8192 total in 1 blocks; 6152 free (5 chunks); 2040 used
> <2020-12-19 13:19:29 GMT>LOG: could not fork new process for connection: Cannot allocate memory
> TransactionAbortContext: 32768 total in 1 blocks; 32728 free (0 chunks); 40 used
> Portal hash: 8192 total in 1 blocks; 1672 free (0 chunks); 6520 used
> PortalMemory: 0 total in 0 blocks; 0 free (0 chunks); 0 used
> 
> My conclusion is this memory error must be related to limits within Postgres tunables, or perhaps
>  something like SHM memory, which we have not set up in the sysctl.conf , so this is just a default amount.
> 
> The values we have in postgres.conf are mostly suggested by pgtune script.  The one exception being
>  max_connections=500, which was increased to try to avoid bottlenecks being reached with Apache client
>  numbers, and gradually over time as we saw we still had lots of memory available with a higher connection limit.
> 
> Which tunables do you need to see?

You probably have to increase the operating system limit for open files
for the "postgres" user (ulimit -n).

Yours,
Laurenz Albe
-- 
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com




pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: frank picabia
Date:
Subject: Re: Error: "could not fork new process for connection: Cannot allocate memory"
Next
From: frank picabia
Date:
Subject: Re: Error: "could not fork new process for connection: Cannot allocate memory"