Re: GUC parameter ACLs and physical walsender - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: GUC parameter ACLs and physical walsender
Date
Msg-id fccc0329cf4d7604b673076f9a72c43fcbc9d5c5.camel@j-davis.com
Whole thread
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2026-06-18 at 13:56 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> It looks to me like the existing branches all assign OID 10097
> to type pg_parameter_acl.  Could we get away with writing
> BKI_ROWTYPE_OID(10097,ParameterAclRelation_Rowtype_Id)
> in the back branches?  It'd depend on whether there are any
> build options that change how many OIDs get assigned before
> this one, but if there aren't ...

Interesting idea.

> It might not be worth taking any risk for, though, given the
> lack of field reports.

That's what I was thinking. If someone is really stuck, there's an easy
workaround, just do a non-replication connection and "SELECT 1" first.

Regards,
    Jeff Davis




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Lucas Jeffrey
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix segmentation fault caused by reentrancy in RI_Fkey_cascade_del (ri_triggers.c)
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal - queryid can be used as filter for auto_explain