Hi,
On 2026-04-23 11:31:34 -0700, Jacob Champion wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2026 at 11:17 AM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
> > > Cool. I have one written up and can share it for comparison, if you'd
> > > like, but it's fairly verbose and I wonder if there's a better way to
> > > do it.
> >
> > Well, if you're already done then please do share it, and we'll use that as a
> > starting point.
>
> Attached. The static_assert for the millisecond calculation is the
> only part I don't really like, but doing an overflow check on a
> calculation that can't overflow int64 is even more verbose/wasteful.
How about instead making sure that actx->authz.interval never gets big enough
to have any chance of overflowing during either the += 5 or the * 1000? It's
clearly ok to error out well before that...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
