On Tue, 2021-06-29 at 11:48 +0500, Andrey Borodin wrote:
> > 29 июня 2021 г., в 03:56, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
> > написал(а):
> >
> > The patch may be somewhat controversial, so I'll wait for feedback
> > before documenting it properly.
>
> The patch seems similar to [0]. But I like your wording :)
> I'd be happy if we go with any version of these idea.
Thank you, somehow I missed that one, we should combine the CF entries.
My patch also covers the backend termination case. Is there a reason
you left that case out?
Regards,
Jeff Davis
