Re: [HACKERS] warning in twophase.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: [HACKERS] warning in twophase.c
Date
Msg-id fc1f88a8-0b19-3367-47bb-dd2b41fa7511@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] warning in twophase.c  (Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan.ladhe@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2017/04/25 16:16, Jeevan Ladhe wrote:
> I have also been seeing this warning lately, I had tried to check git log,
> and
> seems like following commit 546c13e11b29 by Simon has introduced it.
> 
> But per the commit log, this seems to be a temporary arrangement:
> 
> commit 546c13e11b29a5408b9d6a6e3cca301380b47f7f
> Author: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
> Date:   Sun Apr 23 22:12:01 2017 +0100
> 
>     Workaround for RecoverPreparedTransactions()
> 
>     Force overwriteOK = true while we investigate deeper fix
> 
>     Proposed by Tom Lane as temporary measure, accepted by me
> 
> With latest update on following thread, it seems like Simon has proposed a
> fix that gets rid of flag overwriteOK:
> 
>
http://www.postgresql-archive.org/StandbyRecoverPreparedTransactions-recovers-subtrans-links-incorrectly-td5957751.html#a5957853

I see, thanks.

Regards,
Amit




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeevan Ladhe
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] warning in twophase.c
Next
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] statement_timeout is not working as expected withpostgres_fdw