Re: Opteron vs. Xeon "benchmark" - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Guido Neitzer
Subject Re: Opteron vs. Xeon "benchmark"
Date
Msg-id fbbe50e0609230600q1c9750a8nd45eeefc5f786e4f@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Opteron vs. Xeon "benchmark"  (mark@mark.mielke.cc)
Responses Re: Opteron vs. Xeon "benchmark"  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
List pgsql-performance
I find the benchmark much more interesting in comparing PostgreSQL to
MySQL than Intel to AMD. It might be as biased as other "benchmarks"
but it shows clearly something that a lot of PostgreSQL user always
thought: MySQL gives up on concurrency ... it just doesn't scale well.

cug


On 9/23/06, mark@mark.mielke.cc <mark@mark.mielke.cc> wrote:
> Yep. From what I understand, Intel is 8 to 10 times the size of AMD.
>
> It's somewhat amazing that AMD even competes, and excellent for us, the
> consumer, that they compete well, ensuring that we get very fast
> computers, for amazingly low prices.
>
> But Intel isn't crashing down any time soon. Perhaps they became a little
> lazy, and made a few mistakes. AMD is forcing them to clean up.
>
> May the competition continue... :-)
>
> Cheers,
> mark



--
PostgreSQL Bootcamp, Big Nerd Ranch Europe, Nov 2006
http://www.bignerdranch.com/news/2006-08-21.shtml

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Markus Schaber
Date:
Subject: Re: Confusion and Questions about blocks read
Next
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: Opteron vs. Xeon "benchmark"