Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Verite
Subject Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql
Date
Msg-id fb72aa9f-875c-4076-b668-49ba345f6514@mm
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql  (Marcin Mańk <marcin@maniek.info>)
List pgsql-hackers
    Pavel Stehule wrote:

> in the help inside your last patch, you are using "crosstab". Cannto be
> crosstab the name for this feature?

If it wasn't taken already by contrib/tablefunc, that would be a first
choice. But now, when searching for crosstab+postgresql, pages of
results come out concerning the crosstab() function.

So not using \crosstab is deliberate; it's to prevent confusion with
the server-side function.


Best regards,
--
Daniel Vérité
PostgreSQL-powered mailer: http://www.manitou-mail.org
Twitter: @DanielVerite



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: On-demand running query plans using auto_explain and signals
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel Seq Scan