Hi Carlos
On 26/03/2026 18:59, Carlos Alves wrote:
> No errors or failures were detected during the tests.
>
> The only suggestion is to keep the parameter description a single paragraph, following the same style as the
descriptionof the other inclusion parameters. But the current description is coherent and okay.
>
> After the tests, the patch is working as expected:
> - Table-level comments are copied when the `including comments` parameter is used.
> - When there is more than one source table, comments, if any, are kept in the order in which they appear in the
command,separated by a new line.
> - The performance of command execution was not affected.
>
> I think only the code review is missing, but I don't have much experience to perform this step.
Thanks for this thorough review. This helps a lot!
Let's see what the other reviewers have to say about the code and your
docs suggestion.
Best, Jim
