Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Raymond Toy: Case sensitivity bug with large objects! - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vadim B. Mikheev
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Raymond Toy: Case sensitivity bug with large objects!
Date
Msg-id f952537ec33c88f30e4b8e1c21aa90ae
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Raymond Toy: Case sensitivity bug with large objects!  ("Vadim B. Mikheev" <vadim@sable.krasnoyarsk.su>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >
> > The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > > > The lack of case-sensitivity could cause tables that start with xinv* to
> > > > be confused as large objects.
> > > >
> > > > What do we do?
> >
> > Could the xinv* names generated by postgres to support large objects
> > have a slightly different name, for example starting with an underscore
> > or a dot?
>
> We could change large object names from xinv to _inv?  That makes sense.
> pg_dump does not process large objects.

Why don't use relkind ?

>
> What do we do with 6.1?  How many people have tables that begin with
> xinv?
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian
> maillist@candle.pha.pa.us

------------------------------

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: aixssd!darrenk@abs.net (Darren King)
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Case sensitivity bug with large objects!
Next
From: "Vadim B. Mikheev"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Case sensitivity bug with large objects!