Possible old and fixed bug in Postgres? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Steve Rogerson
Subject Possible old and fixed bug in Postgres?
Date
Msg-id f8a40a55-0cfe-9c48-1f34-c157f34b5f46@woodsideendurance.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Possible old and fixed bug in Postgres?
List pgsql-general
I was looking at perl CPAN Module (DateTime::Format::Pg) and saw that it did 
something that seemed odd to me with time zones, based on the comment:

     # For very early and late dates, PostgreSQL always returns times in
     # UTC and does not tell us that it did so.

Early is before 1901-12-14 and late after 2038-01-18

A quick test setting my time zone to be America/Chicago I got

select '1900-01-01 00:00:00'::timestamptz;
       timestamptz
------------------------
  1900-01-01 00:00:00-06
(1 row)

and

select '2040-01-01 00:00:00'::timestamptz;
       timestamptz
------------------------
  2040-01-01 00:00:00-06


These seemed correct to me. I'm guessing this might have been a bug/feature of 
pg in the long ago.


Steve






pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Pranav Hegde
Date:
Subject: PgOutput Replication Message Format - Differentiate between explicit NULL and Omitted Columns during Insert
Next
From: Erik Wienhold
Date:
Subject: Re: Possible old and fixed bug in Postgres?