Any update on this? Are we going for the country-pug or locale-pug convention?
gb.-
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Emanuel CALVO FRANCO
<postgres.arg@gmail.com> wrote:
> that's right ISO3166-2, +1
>
> 2008/11/16 Guido Barosio <gbarosio@gmail.com>:
>> +1 on ISO 3166-2
>>
>> gb.-
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Selena Deckelmann
>> <selenamarie@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Emanuel CALVO FRANCO
>>> <postgres.arg@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> From here on out, non-country pugs will have to have at least 3
>>>>> characters in their abbreviation!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> so, will be rename ArgPug?
>>>
>>> If we follow ISO 3166-2, it would be 'arpug'.
>>>
>>>>> I'll handle the issue with BWPUG (ISO 3166-2 assigns BW to Botswana),
>>>>> if/when it comes up.
>>>>>
>>>>> I still like having the messy naming for the rest of the groups.
>>>>> There's no one standard that's going to address regional, state,
>>>>> province and municipality all at once.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It's a hard work... i think every country must have a general pug,
>>>> then each must allow local groups.
>>>
>>> It's not necessary to have a PUG for every country.
>>>
>>> We are just going to reserve the two-letter prefixes for country codes
>>> from now on.
>>>
>>> We will continue to have language-specific lists, which are not
>>> exclusive to a single country.
>>>
>>> -selena
>>>
>>> --
>>> Selena Deckelmann
>>> PDXPUG - http://pugs.postgresql.org/pdx
>>> Me - http://www.chesnok.com/daily
>>> --
>>> TIP 10: no uses HTML en tu pregunta, seguro que quien responda no podrá leerlo
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Emanuel Calvo Franco
> Syscope Postgresql DBA
> BaPUG / AOSUG Member
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www
>
