Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Binaries vs Source - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Guido Barosio
Subject Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Binaries vs Source
Date
Msg-id f7f6b4c70809091102p1b490afofe3d4acb9cc33529@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Binaries vs Source  (Joshua Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Binaries vs Source
List pgsql-www
Joshua,

*... a surprise to me* ---> Though *compile* would beat other methods.

gb.-

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Joshua Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 10:42:51 -0700
> "Guido Barosio" <gbarosio@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Binary package from www.postgresql.org        121     33.799%
>> Through operating system update tool  127     35.475%
>> ~66%
>>
>> Compile from source   98      27.374%
>>
>> Hmmm, are we doing something with this information? I am not an expert
>> at all, but I reccon that these numbers are at least a surprise to me.
>>
>
> Why is it a surprise?
>
> --
> The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
> PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
> United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
> Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
>
>
>



--
Guido Barosio
-----------------------
http://www.globant.com
guido.barosio@globant.com

pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Joshua Drake
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Binaries vs Source
Next
From: Joshua Drake
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Binaries vs Source