+1
I've said something pretty similar though, or that was my intention at least :)
gb.-
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> "Never attribute to malice what can be explained by stupidity or inattention."
>
> As far as I can tell, SWiK is guilty of nothing worse that sloppiness. I see
> absolutely no reason to assume that they are trying to do something sinister.
> What would be their motivation?
>
> Further, SWiK *does* link back to the original blogs. So some of the argument
> posted here has been based on false premises.
>
> The alternative is to have SWiK not include PostgreSQL at all, which is not a
> good outcome for us. I think that we *might* send them a politely worded
> request to clarify their copyright statement (I'll be happy to do this).
> Beyond that, this seems like a real non-issue.
>
> --
> Josh Berkus
> PostgreSQL @ Sun
> San Francisco
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list (pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-advocacy
>
--
Guido Barosio
-----------------------
http://www.globant.com
guido.barosio@globant.com
